Re: More smoke questions
[email protected] (Alan Burlison) Thu, 07 Aug 2003 16:47:34 +0100
| Newsgroups | perl.daily-build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Abe Timmerman wrote:
>>It's a little more complicated - I have to sync the repository up first,
>>and only run if something has changed.
>
> That's why there is 'smartsmoke', F<smokeperl.pl> will check if the patchlevel
> changed after its synctree-step. No change, no smoke...
Yes, but my UberSmoke script needs not to keep calling smokeperl.pl in a
tight loop when there is actually nothing to do, hence it need to know as
well. No problem, I already have this sorted out.
>> Another RFE is for a 'status' command that shows you
>>how many tests of a run have completed.
>
>
> Individual tests per configuration/$ENV{PERLIO} cannot be determined. But I
> can interpret the F<mktest.out> file and match it against the buildconfig
> file and report what is already done and what is still to be expected.
> But that will have to wait until 1.19 for which I've planned to modularise
> F<mkovz.pl> in such a way that this sort of thing is easy...
Yes, I'm not really bothered about individual test status, more like
'5 of 27 configurations tested, 2 configurations failed tests'
or similar. A 'started ad date' and 'estimated completion by' would be a
bonus ;-)
--
Alan Burlison
--