Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 22310 FAIL(FM) cygwin_nt-5.0 1.5.7(0.109/3/2) (x86/1 cpu)

Hi Merijn,

> On Tue 24 Feb 2004 12:52, "H.Merijn Brand" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue 24 Feb 2004 11:09, "Gerrit P. Haase" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > Failed Test                 Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
>> > >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > ../ext/IPC/SysV/t/ipcsysv.t    1   256    16   32 200.00%  1-16
>> > > ../ext/IPC/SysV/t/msg.t        0    12    ??   ??       %  ??
>> > > ../ext/IPC/SysV/t/sem.t        0    12    ??   ??       %  ??
>> > > ../lib/ExtUtils/t/Install.t    0   139    ??   ??       %  ??
>> > > ../lib/IPC/SysV.t              1   256    16   32 200.00%  1-16
>> > > op/sysio.t                                39    1   2.56%  39
>> > > op/taint.t                     0    12   223  148  66.37%  150-223
>> > > 50 tests and 514 subtests skipped.
>> > > Failed 7/872 test scripts, 99.20% okay. 107/80975 subtests failed, 99.87% okay.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > For IPC function without cygipc, the cygserver needs to run during the
>> > test runs.
>> 
>> IIRC Yitzchak was about to change the test to skip the test if the server was
>> not running.

> Sorry for the speedy follow up

> On second though, how feasible is it to

> if (cygserver_running ()) {
>     do_tests ();
>     }
> elif (cygserver_installed ()) {
>     start_cygserver ();
>     do_tests ();
>     stop_cygserver ();
>     }
> else {
>     skip_tests ();
>     }

> or is this too much of a security risk?


Security?  I think that is not a problem on a developer box.
Would be nice to have this auto-detect feature IMO.

Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=