Re: Single machine version of the test suite.

[email protected] (H . Merijn Brand)
Newsgroups perl.qa,perl.daily-build
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed 08 Aug 2001 16:29, Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:57:13AM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > Not tested!
> > very much easified, no NFS, no multi C-compilers, no install
> > added some comments
> 
> Where should I be sending the output?

[email protected]

For the time being, I think (since your first report showed all OK's) it's
nice to have any failure - esp fail patterns - to be reported to p5p too.

> colon took about 5 hours to do this, and I've got permission to burn CPU
> indefinitely, so I guess I can set it up to smoke 24 hours per day (at low

personally I see no need in this. Once a day will do. I see more use in
streching the test to cover more configurations than in doing more runs of the
same.

> priority). I think also that as there's not enough long double support on
> FreeBSD I ought to remove the long double stuff (And therefore also
> morebits and 64bitall, as there are no 64 bit pointers)

In that case you will have space for a plethora of new configuration
combinations. Ask Sarathy if he is still in need of 5005threads tests.

Next please :-)

-- 
H.Merijn Brand    Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://www.amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.7.1 & 623 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
     WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11 often with Tk800.022 &/| DBD-Unify
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/perl/CPAN/authors/id/H/HM/HMBRAND/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.