Re: Darwin 8.6.0 (Mac OS X 10.4.6)

On 2006=9605=9613, at 17:44, Abe Timmerman wrote:

> Op een mooie lentedag (Thursday 11 May 2006 23:09),schreef  =20
> H.Merijn Brand:
>> If you can tweak it, have a look in Test/SysInfo.pm
>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------=20=

>>> ----
>>> 	From: 	  [email protected]
>>> 	Subject: 	Smoke [5.9.4] 28148 PASS darwin 8.6.0 (macppc/1 =
cpu)
>>> 	Date: 	10 May 2006 17:19:00.000
>>> 	To: 	  domo
>>>
>>> Automated smoke report for 5.9.4 patch 28148
>>> Tullamore.local: PowerMac8,1 (1600 MHz) (macppc/1 cpu)
>
> If you know of a way to translate that "PowerMacX,Y" to something =20
> like G[345]
> (without hardcoding it), that would be nice.

OK. I've done some tweaking:

        Darwin( )

        If the system_profiler program is accessible (meaning that =20
this is Mac
        OS X), use it to find information; otherwise treat as "BSD".

Which gives this on G3, G4 and G5 mono-processors

domo@Dave...:smoke$ perl -I. -MTest::Smoke::SysInfoNew -lwe 'print =20
"$_: ", Test::Smoke::SysInfo->new->$_ foreach qw(cpu_type cpu ncpu =20
host os)'
cpu_type: ppc750
cpu: iMac (400 MHz)
ncpu: 1
host: Daventry.local
os: darwin - 8.6.0 (Mac OS X)

domo@Jung...:smoke$ perl -I. -MTest::Smoke::SysInfoNew -lwe 'print =20
"$_: ", Test::Smoke::SysInfo->new->$_ foreach qw(cpu_type cpu ncpu =20
host os)'
cpu_type: ppcG4
cpu: PowerBook G4 12" (867 MHz)
ncpu: 1
host: Junglinster.local
os: darwin - 8.6.0 (Mac OS X)

domo@Tull...:smoke$ perl -I. -MTest::Smoke::SysInfoNew -lwe 'print =20
"$_: ", Test::Smoke::SysInfo->new->$_ foreach qw(cpu_type cpu ncpu =20
host os)'
cpu_type: ppcG5
cpu: iMac G5 1600 MHz
ncpu: 1
host: Tullamore.local
os: darwin - 8.6.0 (Mac OS X)

Will that do?

Not having an Intel-based Mac to hand, I've not attempted to prettify =20=

whatever it is that system_profiler delivers on that platform -- see =20
the example here: <http://appleintelfaq.com/imac/=20
system_profiler.html>. In particular, T::S::SysInfo currently has =20
nothing to say about the number of cores, as opposed to the number of =20=

processors.