Re: smokecurrent.log vs the report?

On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:29:46 +0200, Dominic Dunlop
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2008=E2=80=9306=E2=80=9303, at 15:17, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>=20
> > I think the '?'s should be either 'F' or 'X' here. No idea as yet why
> > they are '?'
>=20
>=20
> You can specify a maximum wallclock time for a smoke test. '?' is the =20
> reported status for configurations that did not finish or did not get =20
> run because the smoke was still running when the guillotine descended. =20
> Is that what happened during the test in question?
>=20
> See "killtime" on configsmoke.3 man page.

But that would leave you with *one* '?' in the report. I've had many
of those. Bram's report had two '?'s

--=20
H.Merijn Brand         Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.10.x  on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11,
& 11.23, SuSE 10.1 & 10.2, AIX 5.2, and Cygwin.       http://qa.perl.org
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/            http://www.test-smoke.org
                        http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/