Re: Smoke.sh

[email protected] (Nicholas Clark)
Newsgroups perl.daily-build
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 12:39:51PM -0700, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 02:24:38PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> > How long does it take rsync to say "delete that file"? Although, I
> > admit, I'm spoiled with a cable modem.
> 
>     You could try a few experiments with and without make distclean,
> and compare the rsync statistics for each run.
> 
> > Once there is actually a distro, perhaps it would be a good idea to put
> > in a comment to tell people with fat pipes they can safely comment out
> > the line.
> 
>     Why bother?  What's the benefit?

I've got perl code I wrote for BSD to emulate gnu cp's cp -l (use hard links
rather than copying)
I hope that [cloning the tree with links and deleting the old tree] is faster
than [make distclean] but I've not yet trialled it to time it.

Now someone's going to tell me why make distclean is better than a fresh
new copy.

Nicholas Clark
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.