Re: DateTime::Lite

I didn't notice so I didn't write this, but though Time::Piece may be in 
core, it's not in 5.8.x

 > corelist -a Time::Piece
   5.009005   1.11_02
   5.01       1.12

If the argument there was "Time::Piece has /always/ been in core", I 
would concede, but since it's only in the latest release, that would 
defeat my purposes as well.

> I doubt if I am the only person who might ask this question.  Perhaps 
> you should add a comparison to Time::Piece to the POD?

Well, not that I'm trying to be terse...
but I need DateTime, not Time::Piece. I need something that resembles 
DateTime, but faster, leaner, without XS. Time::Piece just wouldn't cut it.

Since XS rules out Time::Piece, I still don't see why /not/? Is there 
any reason why?

--d