Re: epoch() bug with v0.45

Are you sure this is what you intended to do? (from r4116)

-sub quarter {$_[0]->{local_c}{quarter} };
-

--d

Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Avianna Chao wrote:
> 
>> I've been using DateTime 0.41 quite happily for a while, but recently 
>> I upgraded to 0.45, and am encountering a bug where if you do a 
>> epoch() on a DT object that is quite sometime before epoch.
> 
> Fixed in 0.4501.
> 
> 
> -dave
> 
> /*============================================================
> http://VegGuide.org               http://blog.urth.org
> Your guide to all that's veg      House Absolute(ly Pointless)
> ============================================================*/
>