Re: epoch() bug with v0.45

Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Daisuke Maki wrote:
>> Are you sure this is what you intended to do? (from r4116)
>>
>> -sub quarter {$_[0]->{local_c}{quarter} };
>> -
> 
> I'm not sure what you're looking at. It's not in my diff, and the 
> method's still there (the tests would catch it if not).

I find that the diff tool linked to by search.cpan.org is very useful in 
comparing releases.  For example, what it says about changes made in the latest 
DateTime.pm is seen here:

   http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=DateTime-0.45&to=DateTime-0.4501

This is comparing successive *releases*, not just a frequently smaller change in 
version control.

That's quite difference from the quoted 2 line removal.

-- Darren Duncan