Re: Statut of DateTime::TimeZone::LMT

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Jean Forget wrote:

> As a comparison, with DateTime::Locale, there is a register()
> function to hide the internals. Is it possible to have a similar
> function in a future version of DateTime::TimeZone
> so we will be immune to changes of the internals?

Sorry I never responded to this. I think I just forgot.

So yes, I could imagine something similar. That said, the Locale 
registration system is kind of a pain to maintain and I had to bend over a 
bit backwards when I reworked how the internals of the Locale code worked.

> Meanwhile, I have updated DateTime::TimeZone::LMT to use the proper 
> version of the internals, depending on the version of 
> DateTime::TimeZone. I can release a working version as soon as I get a 
> commit bit and a round tuit.

To what do you need a commit bit?


Cheers,

Dave Rolsky
http://blog.urth.org
https://github.com/autarch