Re: Bugtracker DBD::mysql

I agree on getting of RT to Github. Basically, it's 2017 and github is 
good at what it does.


On 11/14/2017 11:40 AM, Dan Book wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Michiel Beijen 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:07 AM,  <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     > Hi! As there are only few tickets on github, it would be easier to
>     > disable creating new tickets on github and those few which are not
>     > resolved yet either move on RT or (if github allows it; which I
>     believe
>     > yet) continue to exists.
>     >
>     > And once any migration is ready, then it can be fully switched.
>     >
>     > Still one bugtracker is better then two, even if it is not on
>     github.
>
>     Yeah, I'm sure this is *easier*. But I really hate the RT cpan bug
>     tracker, so I'd prefer to look again at migrating from RT >> Github -
>     if that really would not work for some reason I'll consider migrating
>     the other way around.
>
>
> I also prefer github but of course it's mainly up to what is easiest 
> for the maintainers. Here is a script for migrating tickets if it's 
> not what you already tried: https://metacpan.org/pod/RTx::ToGitHub
>
> -Dan
>