Re: When might DBI v2 be released
[email protected] (John Scoles)
| Newsgroups | perl.dbi.users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/01/2011 10:40 AM, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:28, John Scoles <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 25/01/2011 10:25 AM, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > > Please change the subject line to match the content of the > question! > (Old subject: "DBI 1.611 + DBD::mysql 4.016 = segfaults on > Ubuntu 10.10 > amd64 ?" > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:54, Tony > Esposito<[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote: > > Hello Tim, > Just curious, Tim, when is DBI 2.0 to be released? > Thanks for all your > hard > work, by the way. DBI->great_stuff()! > > IIRC, the plan (if the term is justified for it) is for DBI v2 > to be > released some time (shortly) after Perl 6 is released. > > > Ah sometime before Easter then;) > > > Is Perl 6 at that stage, or was there no year specified with that > Easter (like there hasn't been a year specified for Perl 6 for a > while). I gave up tracking Perl 6 a few years ago. I know that > Parrot and Rakudo are around and related, but ... > Sorry to get your hopes up Jonathan it is sort of an 'in' joke from one of the YAPCes so no year is specified. I just replaces the 'Perl 6 will be out by Christmas' line. I guess the idea is now that there is 'a working beta' the first production release would be earlier in the year than 'Christmas'. Cheers John > (http://dev.perl.org/perl6/faq.html doesn't give any indication of > which Easter - and previous announcements from 2009 about 2010 show up > with a Google search for 'perl6 release date'). > > There was (is?) a DBI v2 mailing list - I don't think I've > seen any messages > on it for about 5 years, and there never were more than a very > few. > > > -- > Jonathan Leffler <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> #include <disclaimer.h> > Guardian of DBD::Informix - v2008.0513 - http://dbi.perl.org > "Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall never cease > to be amused."