Re: accelerated stepping

Richard Foley wrote:

> If you mean:
> 
> 1. n <- next step over everything (including grep/map/sort).
> 
> 2. s <- step into everything (including grep/map/sort).
> 
> 3. forget nn and N.
> 
> Then I would think this would be (mostly very) intuitive change, and
> the behaviour (most) people would expect from the debugger, most of
> the time.  You'd have to check for unwarranted side effects of
> course, such that blocks other than single-line grep, map and sort,
> remain unaffected, but otherwise it seems to me to be a good idea.

I forgot to mention, yes I agree.

My patch changed only 'n' like you wrote.

Heiko
--