Re: Draft manifest
[email protected] (Johan Vromans) Mon, 6 May 2002 13:13:37 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | perl.dist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> writes: > Second niggly problem is Fcntl. Andy Dougherty's view (AD in the comment > below) was that it was reasonable for a perl script to expect Fcntl to have > been built. Why would Fcntl be a major requirement? Where would a bootstrapping process need it for? -- Johan