Re: Current Issues with perlipc.pod - should they be fixed?
[email protected] (Leon Timmermans) Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:47:50 +0100
| Newsgroups | perl.perl5.porters,perl.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Tom Christiansen <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I'm depressed too. > > I'm depressed that people are telling me that I don't talk good no more. I don't think anyone said any such thing, I sure don't think that. I can imagine it feels like that, since this discussion is about what many perceive to be wrong about those documents, not on what is good about them. > Deleting things from Perl that you've decided make you wrinkle your nose > has always been a a *very* popular idea historically. =C2=A0It's also bee= n > fairly effective at killing off interest in helping develop Perl, because > every new generation find that they disapprove of the one that came befor= e > them, so they'd like to hurry them off to the grave before anybody notice= s. Not deleting anything can be just as effective at killing off interest in helping develop Perl. It's all about balance. > Surely driving away a few people who aren't family friendly is worth the > vast strides of progress you promise to lead those of us who survive into= . Maybe they are driving you away, but you're driving other people away the same way. If I may speak for myself, I find this whole discussion extremely discouraging. If anything, this discussion is far more heated and far more dominated by emotion on all sides than it should be. Leon