Re: Current Issues with perlipc.pod - should they be fixed?

On Friday 03 December 2010 15:25:14 demerphq wrote:
> On 3 December 2010 13:49, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > after I posted my series of patches to perlipc.pod , I saw that tchrist
> > posted his version, which got accepted immediately. As a downside to
> > that, I'll have to restart my work. However, I noticed that perlipc.pod
> > still has many
> 
> > perceived issues. Here is a list of things I noticed:
>
> Shlomi, why didnt you send this to tchrist, and cc p5p?
> 

Don't know - didn't think about it. I assumed he would see my posting as he 
saw my previous posts about the perlipc.pod revamp. I'm CCing him here.

> Dont expect Tom to see your posting.

OK, why shouldn't I? He saw the previious posts.

> 
> He is the one you need to speak to about any of the issues that you
> raise that are not outright bugs but rather style nits.
> 

They are still important, because the people who are trying to help the Perl 
beginners, are often presented with badly written code, and having code like 
that in the core Perl documentation only amplifies the problem, and makes us 
look bad.

Regards,

	Shlomi Fish

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish       http://www.shlomifish.org/
Escape from GNU Autohell - http://www.shlomifish.org/open-
source/anti/autohell/

<rindolf> She's a hot chick. But she smokes.
<go|dfish> She can smoke as long as she's smokin'.

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .