Re: The sperm secret operator: is it new?

[email protected] ("Philippe Bruhat (BooK)") Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:35:23 +0100

Newsgroups	perl.fwp
Message-ID	<20120315153523.GG23822@swoosh>

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:45:47PM +0100, Dmitry Karasik wrote:
> >>>     ~~<>
> >> Looks more like a "kite" operator to me.
> > Does that mean I have a dirty mind?
> 
> That means that there's no such thing as a four-squared sperm! 
> 

Not that =()= resembles much to a... Hrmpf.

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm.
The side view is four-squared enough for me.

The limitations of ASCII shouldn't limit our imaginations!

-- 
 Philippe Bruhat (BooK)

 Too many believe only in the belief.
                                    (Moral from Groo The Wanderer #58 (Epic))