Re: Misprint in Gedcom V 5.5.1

Hi Mike

On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 07:45 +0100, Mike Elston wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> No misprint. If you look at the definitions on p.13 of  
> "optional_line_value"  and "optional_xref_ID" the delimiter is  
> included there in each case. The document is quite correct, this is  
> how grammars are defined.

Yep, my mistake.

$many x $thanx;

> Otherwise the delimiter would be required before and/or after the tag  
> even if there was no optional field.

Sure. That's why pointers are @ ... @, meaning the delim is built-in.

-- 
Ron Savage
http://savage.net.au/
Ph: 0421 920 622