Re: GEDCOM X

On 30/12/2012, at 22.19, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Perfect is the enemy of good, and this has dogged many similar
> initiatives, but GEDCOMX seems to have swung in the opposite direction
> entirely.  I would be pleased to see the project make real progress =
but
> I'm afraid that I find it unlikely.

I agree, there are many unsolved issues with GedcomX, and the =
specification is nowhere near mature enough for anyone to have started =
writing actual code -- but I figure it'll be slightly more likely to get =
to that point if I contribute when I can.

Mikkel=