Re: [November golf] Referees Sought

[email protected] ((Ton Hospel))
Newsgroups perl.golf
Organization lunix confusion services
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In article <87isz7der_._s_@_reezer.burling>,
	Jason Parker-Burlingham <[email protected]> writes:
> [email protected] (Ton Hospel) writes:
> 
>> Wait and have a game as usual.
>> If after, say, a week you think you won't be able to get a golf done at
>> all this month, tell us, and we can then discuss options
>> (e.g. I'd try to get a quick team together. I have enough ideas
>> for challenges)
> 
> I'm afraid a golf this month just isn't going to happen.  I haven't
> been at all well for the last week (the details have been thoughtfully
> elided from this message) or so, and consequently a number of
> real-life responsibilities have piled up.
> 
> `/anick has a great idea for a challenge which could run either this
> month or in some subsequent month.
> 
> I really regret picking up the responsibility and having to lay it
> back down so.
> 
In that case I'd like to step forward to run this month's golf.
Mtve's system is not yet ready to host a TPR-style challenge, so
it would be on the classic PGAS system with human referees. therefore
my questions are:
 - is this ok for anybody ? Does especially Yanick prefer to
   run this one with his idea ?
 - Who controls uploading challenges and passing access rights to
   PGAS nowadays ?
 - Referee candidates, please send me mail saying you want to referee
   And please do so quickly. We're already late.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.