Re: [November golf] Referees Sought
[email protected] ((Ton Hospel))
| Newsgroups | perl.golf |
|---|---|
| Organization | lunix confusion services |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <87isz7der_._s_@_reezer.burling>, Jason Parker-Burlingham <[email protected]> writes: > [email protected] (Ton Hospel) writes: > >> Wait and have a game as usual. >> If after, say, a week you think you won't be able to get a golf done at >> all this month, tell us, and we can then discuss options >> (e.g. I'd try to get a quick team together. I have enough ideas >> for challenges) > > I'm afraid a golf this month just isn't going to happen. I haven't > been at all well for the last week (the details have been thoughtfully > elided from this message) or so, and consequently a number of > real-life responsibilities have piled up. > > `/anick has a great idea for a challenge which could run either this > month or in some subsequent month. > > I really regret picking up the responsibility and having to lay it > back down so. > In that case I'd like to step forward to run this month's golf. Mtve's system is not yet ready to host a TPR-style challenge, so it would be on the classic PGAS system with human referees. therefore my questions are: - is this ok for anybody ? Does especially Yanick prefer to run this one with his idea ? - Who controls uploading challenges and passing access rights to PGAS nowadays ? - Referee candidates, please send me mail saying you want to referee And please do so quickly. We're already late.