Re: The monthly golf *IS* happening

En op 18 november 2002 sprak Ton Hospel:
> Well, we have to do SOMETHING,

Why? As far as I'm concerned, it's OK to have two winners. Especially if
they are as good as this. (I enjoyed the first three, four hours of the
contest, when I was battling Chris Dolan for 1st and 2nd; I'm a bit less
enthusiastic now that I'm 'fighting' with Chris for 12th...)

> there's only one prize as far as I know.

Ah, yes, there is that. Still, I think the number of winners can and
should be independent of the number of available prizes.

> I agree that it's very late in the game for these changes, and I'm
> open to alternative suggestions.

Time of submission? It has always been my favorite :-) . And I think
there was more than 24 hours between Rick's and Stephen's solution, so
time zones have had no decisive effect.

Of course I could also submit my 49.3 that I've been saving for the last
moment ;-)

(-ugene

-- 
Not that the story need be long, but it will take a long while to make
it short. -- |-|enry |)avid 7`horeau