| Newsgroups |
perl.golf |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Ton Hospel wrote:
>
> Both cases were because I had no IP connectivity, and when I got back
> online saw that a golf was running again. I did think about it for a few
> hours and actually had a few 64's, but didn't submit it since it wouldn't
> be representative compared to people who thought about it for 3 days.
Let's see ... 64 would have been 95 points and that would have brought
down your average score, is that it? I think you would have represented
yourself quite well against this field of competitors :) There's always
3 days of post-mortem to come up with new tricks.
The 64 wouldn't have helped me anyway, only a 62 or better would have
reduced the score of my nearest competitor :)
Doesn't it bother you that MTV has moved into the top spot for most
holes played at 32?
I hope you have IP next round.
Michael