Re: Comments on Cipher Minigolf
[email protected] ((Ton Hospel))
| Newsgroups | perl.golf |
|---|---|
| Organization | lunix confusion services |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] writes: > Let's see ... 64 would have been 95 points and that would have brought > down your average score, is that it? I think you would have represented > yourself quite well against this field of competitors :) There's always > 3 days of post-mortem to come up with new tricks. The time before that my quick attempt would actually have increased my average score and I didn't submit that one either. Selective submitting would be unfair.