Re: New golf "Strange numbers"

En op 09 mei 2003 sprak Daniel Tuijnman:
> Obviously, the problem turned out to be much simpler than expected.
> It's so simple that it leaves no room for any creativity in writing it down.
> (well, it surprises me there are still two ways to write it down, but
> nevertheless). Golfing is about trying to chop() off an extra stroke by
> rearranging your algorithm, trying out another one, etc. In this case, looking
> half an hour, 3/4 tops, gives you an algorithm which cannot be improved upon.

I remember another hole that was too simple for creativity, and that
had a solution which could not be improved upon.

I also remember what happened next.

(-ugene
-- 
Too great length and too great brevity of discourse tends to obscurity;
too much truth is paralyzing. -- |3laise |*ascal