Re: ton's solutions

In article <[email protected]>,
	Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> writes:
>> perl -wle 'print+(0..3)[2**32]'
> 
> 3
> 
Ok, I totally misjudged what would happen on 32-bit perls, so
my solution is wrong. It's easy enough to fix at the cost of a few
strokes (e.g. using 188/~- instead of 1<< is one that directly 
comes to mind). Maybe generating a formula for chr will also work. 
So my solution should be either dropped or moved back
a bit. This is where not having judges hurts. We'll need to work out
something fair.