Re: A new golf "Automatic Editing" has started

[email protected] (Phil Carmody)
Newsgroups perl.golf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- Ronald J Kimball <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:27:10PM -0000, Mtv Europe wrote:
> > Hello Daniel!
> > 
> > [email protected] (Daniel Tiefnig) wrote:
> > 
> > > Well, you could still say "a" -> "a"..
> > 
> > Nope, it's not permitted.   Generic rule #2, "The program is expected to 
> > finish in a reasonable time", so input that leads to endless loop is
> > not allowed.
> 
> What a curious inference.  Can I similarly conclude that any other input
> which causes my program to take a long time to execute is prohibited?
> 
> Generic rule #2 is a restriction on the code, not on the input.  Either the
> code must detect an infinite loop and terminate "in a reasonable time",
> according to generic rule #2, or this particular golf challenge needs a
> specific rule regarding input which causes an infinite loop.

The rules say to me that you're not permitted to /partially/ carry out a set
of replacements you must do them all. That means that any replacements that
look like they are infinite loops should not terminate. That means no 
interruption of a potentially infinite loop.

For example, "the program must return within a reasonable time two proper 
factors of the input" would be a restriction on the code, however, it implies 
that all input must be composite.

Phil


=====
Given that Dubya has control of a such vast arsenal, I'm sure 
the most pressing issue on his mind is :

Which bombs would Jesus drop?     (-- "mm")

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.