Re: Alternative catalogue format for maktext?

> Is there any particular reason it can't be implemented in a 
> Locale::Maketext subclass first, at least just so it can be tried out in a 
> large system before I go making it part of Locale::Maketext itself?

Sure. The parse() could also be Demo::L10N's method without changing
maketext itself. I think I could try it on RT::I18N first.

> If nothing else, I'd like to just delay having to think about this, as I'm 
> currently buried under months of work that backed up while I was working on 
> my /Perl & LWP/ book.

Take care and take your time. :-)

/Autrijus/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6d-cvs (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAjzRjFUACgkQtLPdNzw1AaCJIwCdF2My1nFCCvrh/O3HpElgGCGg
258An3bHKV6+bHN+DUdzBubI4B+JgtPR
=Dj5D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----