| Newsgroups |
perl.inline |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Mon May 26 20:35:23 2014: Request 95809 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by [email protected]
Queue: Inline
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #95809] [PATCH] Using Inline in a distribution with multiple modules
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: Nobody
Requestors: [email protected]
Status: open
Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=95809 >
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason McCarver via RT
> So just out of curiosity (and this may not be the proper forum) why do you
> prefer your layout?
That's the layout I've always used, and it has never given me any trouble.
(That's pretty much the full extent of my reasoning ;-)
I also think the additional Makefiles.PL can only provide additional
flexibility, as we're seeing here.
According to my (admittedly unreliable) memory, the layout I use dates back
a long way, whereas the layout you're using is relatively recent.
I don't know why the "newer" layout became popular - I'll have to find out.
Perhaps then things might be a little clearer.
Cheers,
Rob