Re: ithreads and sockets

[email protected] (Paul Archer)
Newsgroups perl.ithreads
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yesterday, Steve Schein wrote:

> Launch the TCP socket and both UDP sockets on threads spawned from the
> main program and keeping them open to perform on-going tasks which
> primarily includes passing data back to the main program for two of the
> sockets and sending messages from the main program for the other
> socket.  I suspect the sockets need to stay open and not necessarily the
> threads but I hope to learn that during through the dialog here.  I've
> read through perlthrtut a couple of times and walked away with an empty
> and uneasy feeling.  In that document a reader is told that a thread
> must be closed before data can be passed back which seemed like a bad
> thing considering my sockets are intended to stay open indefinitely.

You may want to reread perlthrtut. It says that a thread can return data
just like any subroutine could when it ends. But a lot of the reason to use
threads it to be able to pass data from thread to thread easily. That's what
shared variables are all about. Set a variable to a value (lock it first) in
one thread, and read the value (again, lock it first) in another thread. Or
use Thread::Enqueue, and enqueue a value in one thread, then dequeue it in
another.

Paul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.