Re: new list suggestion: [email protected]

[email protected] (Chris Devers)
Newsgroups perl.jobs.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Terrence Brannon wrote:

> I do tell the people contacting me to post them on jobs.perl.org, but
> they rarely do --- and maybe that is why such a list should not exist?
> They have already nabbed a candidate with their widespread net...

I'm not comfortable with the idea of doing this behind anyone's back. If
someone declined the suggestion to redirect a job to jobs.perl.org, it
may be because of laziness, but it may also be that, for whatever
reason, they didn't want to find a candidate that way.

By surriptitiously forwarding declined job offer mails to a hypothetical
<[email protected]> list, we're effectively becoming spammers.
Polite, well-meaning spammers maybe, but it's still not right, is it?

I think the list should at least be put on some kind of opt-in or
opt-out grounds. If you get a job solicitation that you aren't
interested in, and would like to forward it to this new list, I think
the protocol should at least be to sent this person a form letter, e.g.

    I'm sorry, I'm not looking for a job right now, but if you'd like I
    can circulate the details of the job among some qualified people who
    are are looking at <http://jobs.perl.org/forwards/>. Would it be
    okay with you if I forward your mail to this site?

Or, for a less pushy version, go 'opt-out' with a final sentence like:

    [....] Unless you have any objections, I'd like to forward your
    mail to this site.

Or words to that effect.

I think the list is essentially a good idea, but I'm not sure that just
forwarding everything without contacting the person filling the job is
the right way to do it. Make sense?


-- 
Chris Devers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.