Re: new list suggestion: [email protected]
[email protected] (Chris Devers)
| Newsgroups | perl.jobs.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Terrence Brannon wrote: > I do tell the people contacting me to post them on jobs.perl.org, but > they rarely do --- and maybe that is why such a list should not exist? > They have already nabbed a candidate with their widespread net... I'm not comfortable with the idea of doing this behind anyone's back. If someone declined the suggestion to redirect a job to jobs.perl.org, it may be because of laziness, but it may also be that, for whatever reason, they didn't want to find a candidate that way. By surriptitiously forwarding declined job offer mails to a hypothetical <[email protected]> list, we're effectively becoming spammers. Polite, well-meaning spammers maybe, but it's still not right, is it? I think the list should at least be put on some kind of opt-in or opt-out grounds. If you get a job solicitation that you aren't interested in, and would like to forward it to this new list, I think the protocol should at least be to sent this person a form letter, e.g. I'm sorry, I'm not looking for a job right now, but if you'd like I can circulate the details of the job among some qualified people who are are looking at <http://jobs.perl.org/forwards/>. Would it be okay with you if I forward your mail to this site? Or, for a less pushy version, go 'opt-out' with a final sentence like: [....] Unless you have any objections, I'd like to forward your mail to this site. Or words to that effect. I think the list is essentially a good idea, but I'm not sure that just forwarding everything without contacting the person filling the job is the right way to do it. Make sense? -- Chris Devers