RE: should a resume have a "Reason for Leaving" line? general resume assessment request
[email protected] ("Larson Rider") Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:00:41 -0800
| Newsgroups | perl.jobs.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Terrence, I just saw your original post. You don't need a reason for leaving on your resume, but in this case it would not have hurt. I often see contractor resumes with reasons for leaving included. However, IMO your recruiter did not do their job. They should have anticipated the question. Then again, you could have anticipated it too and given your recruiter the information. Also make sure the recruiter knows why you fit, what your pay needs are, and MOST OF ALL that they agree to tell you where your resume is going BEFORE they submit it. You are the one who has more to lose in agency conflicts. Many companies back off of a candidate and for contracts it's not just the agency that send the resume first that wins. It's the one that causes the hire. I have submitted many candidates after initial submittal and gotten the deal because the candidate was turned down, but I tested, or included more information or checked references... Something substantial that showed to the client that the candidate should be seen. In California, for W2 contracts, the legal winner is usually the agency that caused the hire. Most often that is the first to submit, but there are lots of exceptions. For direct, fulltime positions the first submittal is a stronger case in a conflict. Lars -----Original Message----- From: Terrence Brannon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 8:29 AM To: L-Perl-Jobs-Discuss Subject: should a resume have a "Reason for Leaving" line? general resume assessment request On one of my recent jobs I was laid off after 3 months. The company I was submitted to noticed this and asked the recruiter about it, who then asked me and then relayed the information. This delayed the application process. Had I put a "Reason for leaving" line on my resume, this delay could have been avoided. Is it a good idea to add such a line to expedite resume evaluation? BTW, here is my resume: http://metaperl.com/resume/newperlresume.html http://metaperl.com/resume/newperlresume.pdf Some other things I added were a "tools used" and "skills used" line based on feedback. If anyone has any other suggestions I would appreciate it. I've been told my resume is too long, but I don't know how to shorten it without omitting important details.