Re: Philosophical Issues of JPL & perljvm/Jasmin
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:42:28 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.jpl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian Jepson wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>
> > As for the current status of projects, I cannot comment on the status of
> > JPL, as I don't work on it. Brian, et al., can you comment?
> There isn't currently any steering of JPL going on right now, but it would
> be good if someone wanted to start steering it in some direction.
I can chime in to say that I would like to someday see the JPL integrate
with perljvm. What I envision is a JPL system that allows you to generate
either pure native JVM bytecode, or the hybrid it now produces.
Far in the future, I want perljvm to allow to access Perl objects from Java
and Java objects from Perl, which is what JPL currently provides.
So, I think that a very long term goal should be integration. Such
integration would probably be premature now, but it is something we should
be considering, I think.
> > As for the current status of perljvm: Work continues. I work on it roughly
> > 20-30 hours a week. It is slow going, due to some annoyances about the JVM
> > that I have had to work around. However, more features of Perl are
> > supported on a weekly basis.
> >
> > (Please note that the current release of B::JVM::Jasmin is far from what
> > perljvm can do now. I haven't had time to do another release, but I hope to
> > do one RSN.)
> Is there anything I can do to help you produce weekly snapshots? This is
> the sort of grunt work that I could help with.
I could provide even daily snapshots pretty trivially, if this would be
useful. I guess the only reason I haven't done it is that I haven't seen a
request for it yet. I didn't see the point in doing it unless I knew at
least one person would use it.
--
- [email protected] - Bradley M. Kuhn - [email protected] -
http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE4zXzk53XjJNtBs4cRAZCbAKCfCz9jtNN75IWumPf8OPZ5Ec+FegCeN2Nd uuOkqTMSa4i/ooYoAnB0iH4= =hjQg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----