Re: what is the best practice to modrdn for branch of objects?

> On 19 Jun 2018, at 05:58, Zeus Panchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> Chris Ridd <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Net::LDAP's moddn method does not take a =E2=80=9Erecursively=E2=80=9C =
option.
>=20
> may it sound sane to add it to the method?
>=20
>> The LDAP modifydn operation is already defined to move all the =
entry's
>> children.
>=20
> I believe, it'd be great to have something like that in Net::LDAP too =
=E2=80=A6

Well that=E2=80=99s up to Peter, but I would say that no it doesn=E2=80=99=
t make sense because the operations in LDAP.pm only do what the RFCs =
describe.

I think you should write your own wrapper/utility function that does =
what your use case needs.

Cheers,

Chris=