[rt.cpan.org #53914] Bug report for Win32::API::Callback
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois via RT")
| Newsgroups | perl.libwin32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tue Sep 07 15:44:56 2010: Request 53914 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by JDB
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: Bug report for Win32::API::Callback
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: Nobody
Requestors: [email protected]
Status: open
Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=53914 >
On Tue Sep 07 07:51:32 2010, ACALPINI wrote:
> the difference is the WINAPI instead of CALLBACK definition. I think it
> may have something to do with calling conventions and how parameters are
> pushed to the stack.
>
> this would man that callbacks defined in C as WINAPI are not supported,
> only those defined as CALLBACK are.
>
> but digging in the C headers to find the real difference between WINAPI
> and CALLBACK, or even adding support for different calling conventions
> in Win32::API::Callback is beyond my scope at the moment, sorry :-(
I think WINAPI and CALLBACK are both synonyms for __stdcall, so that
should not make any difference.
Cheers,
-Jan