RE: 3 Win32::API bugs

----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 10:35:37 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 3 Win32::API bugs
>
> On 05/09/2012 09:23 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> >> How is the no short problem supposed to be fixed? Moving struct to
> >> letter "T" would break too many grandfathered perl scripts right? So
> >> should a short be "T" then?
> >
> > I would definitely try to keep backward compatibility.
>
> I was thinking about getting "$" for unsigned short. looks almost like
> an S... :-)
What about signed short? There is no lower case dollar sign for signed short.

Since Callback is crashing, I dont know whether to try to fix it, so I have a question, did 02_Callback.t ever not crash with a certain version number of Win32::API, with a certain compiler, etc?

Or should I forget about callback and try and fix the 3 other bugs (func not found dll handle leak, no unsigned return values, no shorts) which are easier targets to kill than Callback and then try Callback if I have the time?

Thanks for respond Aldo.