Re: [Fwd: Module namespace request: Event::RPC]
[email protected] (Joshua N Pritikin) Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:27:20 +0530
| Newsgroups | perl.loop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-MVaDZDEXXGWmzhZtbi6e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 14:27 +0100, J=C3=B6rn Reder wrote: > Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > Yah. > >=20 > > I like the Event::RPC API. That's my cursory evaluation. >=20 > So "contaminating" the Event namespace with it is Ok for you? ;) Sure, but as Uri suggested, it would be proper for you to search CPAN for similar modules. It would be useful for people to know all the alternatives, pro and con. --=-MVaDZDEXXGWmzhZtbi6e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCNGLfqcqnlKSmC70RAt+qAJ9bT2k/N4yruKO5Do/1jUBAiSVe3ACglQ7Z BlWhTchimK6Y73NGgzwr6Rg= =995Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MVaDZDEXXGWmzhZtbi6e--