Re: set attribute return values
[email protected] (Joshua N Pritikin)
| Newsgroups | perl.loop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 03:37:32PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > > All the attributes are the same. What do you want $w->prio(6) to > > return? The old priority or the new priority? Is it really worth the > > trouble of returning anything? > > A feature of Perl I really like is that it works in expressions. An operation > supplies something, a statement supplies something, a block supplies something > and so forth. This is VERY useful to nest statements and write compact > programs. (This was already well implemented in C, but even better in Perl.) > Now, here is a method that replies nothing - in certain circumstances. :-( I > like nesting and conciseness. I suggest to reply the new value. It's no really > new information at this point, of course, so someone may prefer the old one, > but I personally think this would be less intuitive. OK, it's on the TODO list, but I'm not feeling an urgent need to implement it. Perhaps I will implement it before v1.0... -- "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank