Re: linux bug in event??
[email protected] (Uri Guttman)
| Newsgroups | perl.loop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected].> |
>>>>> "JNP" == Joshua N Pritikin <[email protected]> writes: JNP> On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 06:55:41PM -0400, [email protected] wrote: >> Ignored 't' in poll mask at >> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-linux/Event/Watcher.pm line 71. >> >> i am adding the 't' poll code as well as the timeout method. are you >> ignoring the 't' if the method is passed? not a biggie, i remove the 't' >> when i am adding the timeout method. just tell mat that is ok. it seems >> to timeout fine without the 't'. JNP> Yah. The 't' flags is read-only since the watcher already knows JNP> whether to timeout based upon whether the timeout is set. JNP> Perhaps the API is slightly misleading. yeah. if all you want is a timeout still need to know read or write but the timout time arg tells you that (unless you also provide a default timeout value like i do). in any case removed the 't' and the warnign went away. but a real bug is you don't report where the call came from. the warning reports the line in Watcher.pm and it should be reporting the line in my code. uri -- Uri Guttman --------- [email protected] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com SYStems ARCHitecture, Software Engineering, Perl, Internet, UNIX Consulting The Perl Books Page ----------- http://www.sysarch.com/cgi-bin/perl_books The Best Search Engine on the Net ---------- http://www.northernlight.com