Re: Event::io watcher w/ poll='w' on Solaris

[email protected] (Joshua N Pritikin) Sun, 26 May 2002 11:22:18 +0530
Newsgroups perl.loop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:06:53PM -0400, Allen Smith wrote:
> > Since the Event::io module is very flexible in regards to what events can
> > be "waited" for: Why not introduce another set of conditions, like
> > "urgent" ('u') or "out-of-band" ('o') to still provide the functionality
> > for those few, who really use urgent/oob data together with Event::io
> > triggers on the writing end of a socket/pipe/whatever.
> 
> Hmm... I am wondering whether a flag for "include out-of-band" is a more
> correct way to do this - in other words, should not only "w" include
> "out-of-band" availability, but should "r" include "out-of-band"
> availability. How independent these two desires for checking are - and can
> be on various OSes - is a good question.

i'm inclined to wait until someone actually requests that Event support
out-of-band data before making further changes.

-- 
Victory to the Divine Mother!!         after all,
  http://sahajayoga.org                  http://why-compete.org