Re: Proposed Mac::Pasteboard
| Newsgroups | perl.macosx |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <6174562a-e1a1-41a0-8f05-51946095a306@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> |
On Jan 28, 9:32 am, [email protected] (Brian D Foy) wrote: > In article > <23e4b5a9-68b1-44f7-9161-4d41d606c...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > But it seems un- > > parsimonious to me to use namespace for maybe a dozen lines of Perl, > > since right now the "clipboard" part is on the order of > > It's the idea that counts, not the actual implementation. Namespaces > separate ideas into their own parts of the world and hide all of the > details from the user. It doesn't matter what the code is or how long > it is. :) That seems to argue that I publish Mac::Pasteboard pretty much as is, then follow with Mac::Clipboard. It's lazy, but is it lazy _enough_? Would it expedite discussion if I put out a pre-release of the code? If so, how should it be done? Mail the tarball to people who ask? Post to the newsgroup? Submit to CPAN with a development version number? I can't guarantee the documentation to be limpid prose, but the code works. Tom Wyant