re: [MacPerl-WebCGI] A v B = ?
[email protected] Sat, 10 Mar 2001 14:09:17 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.macperl.webcgi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p05010400b6d010179783@[64.194.142.225]> |
>[email protected] wrote: >>So, where is it that you're running the code and receiving those errors? >on my mac under MacPerl > >As to issue of the script running on your mac, but not on the server >as a CGI : >this may not be due to the '-w' switch a such, but if you insist on not >using it you'll find people will be reluctant to help you, (see below) Robin: I'm not refusing to use the -w option nor have I said that I refuse to do so. Apparently, I have not been clear as to the problems I experienced and my inquiries regarding as to its use -- for that I apologize. As for reading FAQ's -- I read everything I can and all referenced me. The reference you provided is one that I was not aware, but shall use. I do find that there is a vast amount of information on Perl and as such, I am simply overwhelmed by its shear volume. I am probably like many others in that not everything I read is immediately comprehended - sometimes the elusive nature of the syntax evades my immediate acknowledgement. Furthermore, I have found errors in some reference material which has lead me astray and it takes a while to sort things out. Granted, I have purpose and have probably leaped past some of the introductory aspects of the language in an attempt to fulfill my goal. But from my perspective, it's hard to sort out what is actually introductory and what is not -- considering the shear volume of the reference material. So, I am sure there remains a significant amount of introductory material for me to consider -- that in itself is a problem. But, I have not intentionally taken advantage of other's time beyond what I would consider to be unreasonable. I am simply trying to understand and thought that this list was a forum to assist me. To me, the questions I post are not trivial -- but apparently, I am alone in that view. It's almost humorous in that some things are so obvious to some, but not others. In any event, I consider myself forewarned. You have been very helpful, gracious and polite in pointing out my failing to read the relevant references. In the future I shall make very effort to research all sources of information available to me before posting another question to this list. I thank you for your time and guidance. tedd -- http://sperling.com/