Re: Rethinking how ext/ is tested
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl5.porters,perl.makemaker |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
demerphq wrote:
>> t/harness still needs to be dealt with. And the system for copying
>> ext/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/lib into lib is incomplete. I'm not sure how that
>> should best be done. Ideally I'd like make to take care of it so that as
>> ext/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/lib is edited, it will be copied into lib as necessary.
>
> Sounds pretty interesting. One thing to keep in mind tho is that
> Harness is the standard test framework on some platforms, in
> particular win32.
t/harness will get fixed, too. I just wanted to get something working to show
so you guys aren't so "OMG YOULL BREAK STUFFS!!1!!!!1!"
--
"I went to college, which is a lot like being in the Army, except when
stupid people yell at me for stupid things, I can hit them."
-- Jonathan Schwarz