Re: Where to report bugs in website 'search.cpan.org' ?

[email protected] (Dan Book)
Newsgroups perl.module-authors
Message-ID <CABMkAVU7hmWkVhWop7vHe_812Axp_vSd6qW+bJDw=RUjmZFNEg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Linda A. Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Moving this question to module-authors as per David G.'s feedback.
>
> I was looking for available mail-filtering, aka Milter, mods, and
> came across Mail-Milter.
>
> I noticed it has 1 review rating it a single *.  and it wanted to
> know if the review was helpful -- and it wasn't --
> as it doesn't say *what* version the review was about.
>
> The reviews seem to be generally "worthless", if they don't
> tell me which version is being reviewed.  A comment about a module
> from V0.0.1 isn't very useful for a module at version 2.3.7 (as a
> randomly chosen example).
>
> This brings up a few requests/ideas for improvement:
>
> 1) Could the version number a review refers to be included?
>
> For comments already posted, either, mark them as too old to
> to have included the reviewed version, OR, *IF* the date
> of the review is known (it probably should be included in the
> review anyway), then match it to the highest version before
> the review was added.
>
> 2) There should be a way of "closing out" reviews that would have
> really been better placed as bugs or RFE's, that have been addressed
> (i.e. bug-fixed, or feature-added, etc...).
>
> As it stands now, reviews don't say anything about current versions
> and for "bug-fix" reviews, there's no way to indicate the bug was
> fixed and the review doesn't apply to a more current version.  There
> is also no way to respond to a review to mention that anything has changed
> or been fixed.  Any response ends up as another, _unconnected_ comment --
> not very useful.
>
> Thoughts?  Ideas/feedback?
> Thanks...
>
>
>
>
(Resending as it didn't go to the list)

These issues are mostly regarding the cpanratings site itself, which is not
part of search.cpan.org. You can find its issue tracker here:
https://github.com/perlorg/perlweb/issues

And you might also find this discussion interesting, regarding similar
links from metacpan.org: https://github.com/metacpan/metacpan-web/
issues/1653
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.