Re: A funny module that shortens one-liners - is it worth global namespace?

> On Dec 27, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Konstantin S. Uvarin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
>   I've come up with idea or a module that shortens (mostly test) one-liners.

That module should be called Stash::Alias, not HAS.

>   E.g. we have something like
> 
>   perl -we 'use My::Very::Long::Module; $x = My::Very::Long::Module->new( foo => 42 ); print $x->foo;'
> 
>   I've come up with an interface to shorten that to just
> 
>   perl -Mnew=x=My::Very::Long::Module,foo,42 -we "print $x->foo;"
> 
>   It works well under strict, too.
> 
>   And it looks like it makes some sense - see this Perlmonks discussion: http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=1178455
> 
>   However, I'm still unsure if the fun is worth putting into global namespace, and module name HAS to be short, otherwise it kills the idea.
> 
>   Maybe there's a way to get people to try it out first without polluting CPAN if it fails?
> 
>   Acme::n? github project w/o CPAN release?..
> 
>   The module itself:
> 
>   https://gist.github.com/dallaylaen/206a649ea54db4c6db93e99a2e9514b0
> 
>   Thank you,
> 
> --
> Konstantin S. Uvarin
> jabber: see <from>
> skype: kuvarin
> http://github.com/dallaylaen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAlhiQpkACgkQmm2SYo/9yULruQCgjTn2493asXjt5hQangtiSQR8
C78An02J9PmdL0V7VQmLjr+fwqtVxDs8
=YLFl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----