[RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s?
[email protected] (Shlomi Fish) Sat, 11 Aug 2018 22:51:49 +0300
| Newsgroups | perl.module-authors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all!
This post is a little flamebait, so please try to keep the discussion civil.
Anyway, after reading the discussion in this public github issue, and following
some of the links (especially
https://szabgab.com/what-does--if-it-aint-broke-dont-fix-it--really-mean.html ),
do you think I was being unreasonable, or should I as a CPAN
author/maintainer/adopter accommodate for people running old perl5s, in my case
5.10.x and below:
https://github.com/shlomif/perl-XML-SemanticDiff/issues/3
This reminds me of what chromatic wrote here -
https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2008/09/msg140206.html :
«
This is why we can't have nice things.
»
Any comments or opinions? I think I'll relax by watching a nice and fun video.
-- Shlomi
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
http://is.gd/htwEXQ - Integrating GNU Guile into GNU coreutils
Joel’s Generalisation: If it happens to you, it happens to everybody.
(Or: It’s never only you.)
— Based on http://www.joelonsoftware.com/news/20020402.html
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .