Re: Is Sort:Naturally a Little Off?

[email protected] (Shawn H Corey) Sat, 25 Sep 2021 08:24:24 -0400

Newsgroups	perl.module-authors
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

--------------E65982208F63E693924E6E37
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2021-09-25 4:29 a.m., Smylers wrote:
> So it appears that en_CA.utf8 and en_GB.utf8 sort ‘a’ and ‘A’ the
> opposite way round to each other. I wonder why. (Not relevant to any bug
> in Sort::Naturally, but it's now intriguing me.)

I tried en_US.utf8 and en_AU.utf8. They both follow en_GB.utf8. 
en_CA.utf8 seems to be the odd one out. Don't know why.


--------------E65982208F63E693924E6E37
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2021-09-25 4:29 a.m., Smylers wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:[email protected]">
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">So it appears that en_CA.utf8 and en_GB.utf8 sort ‘a’ and ‘A’ the
opposite way round to each other. I wonder why. (Not relevant to any bug
in Sort::Naturally, but it's now intriguing me.)</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I tried en_US.utf8 and en_AU.utf8. They both follow en_GB.utf8.
      en_CA.utf8 seems to be the odd one out. Don't know why.<br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------E65982208F63E693924E6E37--