Re: Module::BuildX::* vs Module::Build::*
[email protected] ("Christopher J. Madsen")
| Newsgroups | perl.module.build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If we didn't already have other M::B subclasses in the M::B:: namespace, then I'd definitely go with Module::BuildX::DistVersion. If I thought that Module::BuildX:: was a good long-term solution, then I'd certainly use it. But the proper long-term solution is a real plug-in architecture. I've got some thoughts on that I'm going to write up in a separate thread. That would use Module::Build::Plugin::* (or maybe Module::BuildX::* if we want to keep the names shorter). Since Module::BuildX:: would be just a temporary stopgap, I don't really see the need for it. We already have half a dozen M::B::subclass modules. If a few more are introduced before the plug-in system is ready, it won't make any significant difference. -- Chris Madsen [email protected] -------------------- http://www.cjmweb.net --------------------