Fwd: argh

Hi all,

This looks like another case of thwarting my attempt at changing how we 
find the dist_version.  This has a module_name set, plus a 
dist_version_from.

Is the previous behavior as-documented or accidental?

That is, what does module_name mean, and what does dist_name mean if 
dist_version_from means something that module_name doesn't?  (If any of 
that makes any sense?)

--Eric

----------  Forwarded Message:  ----------

Subject: Re: Module::Build 0.2809 release coming, should we test it?
Date: Wednesday 10 September 2008 23:04
From: Slaven Rezic <[email protected]>
To: Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]>

I am also smoke testing Module::Build 0.2803 against a smaller list
than yours, using just distributions which had previously a PASS on my
system. The smoker is not yet finished, but I found a regression which
looks like being caused by Module::Build.

Here are the both reports, the first (a PASS) created with
Module::Build 0.2808, the second (a FAIL) with 0.2808_03.

Regards,
    Slaven

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
"I've often gotten the feeling that the only people who have learned
from computer assisted instruction are the authors."
--Ben Schneiderman
---------------------------------------------------
    http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------