Re: here comes the gold gold gold alpha (a year and a half?!)
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler")
| Newsgroups | perl.module.build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 12, 2008, at 00:10, Eric Wilhelm wrote: > Hi all, > > I've backed-out r10222 and r10224 and shipped 0.2808_04. > > Unless somebody points out that this has the exploding chipmunk nature > in the next couple of days, I think it is safe to say we can ship 0.29 > before Monday. (I'm tempted to bump the version number to 0.3 just to > save the typing at this point.) Excellent. And +1 on Upping the release to 0.30. It has been forever and there have been a shitload of changes. > Moving on from that, my current wishlist: > > * new 'N' key for my laptop :-( > * test coverage for this module_name + dist_version_from case > (my broken feature had test coverage, which has also been reverted) > (bah) > * testcover working (more on that later) > * M::B should pass its own testpod > * M::B should pass its own testpodcoverage[1] > * test coverage for any uncovered, documented feature > * oh crap, the RT queue?! > * any sort of automated smoke system that isn't cpantesters[2] * A plugin system. This is still on my radar to do at some point. Someday. Maybe. > So, that's the current state of things. I think I can tolerate > pushing > the tarballs and applying patches right now, but I haven't got time > for > much else and that still doesn't leave time for me to take a crack > at a > plugin system or much of anything else that I would actually enjoy > hacking on. With 2000+ distributions, not much test coverage, and no > smoke process, I basically don't feel like I can actually *do* > anything. Can you add some of the necessary tests? Or Ken? > Do we need to hand out more commit bits or candy or what? Yes, once there is adequate test coverage. Best, David