Re: When Was This Fixed?
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler")
| Newsgroups | perl.module.build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well then, should I just put 0.30 in configure_requires? Best, David Sent from my iPhone On Sep 28, 2008, at 11:54, Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote: > # from David E. Wheeler > # on Sunday 28 September 2008: > >> On Sep 28, 2008, at 10:48, Ken Williams wrote: >> >>> I don't see anything in our Changes file that explicitly addresses >>> this, perhaps it got fixed as a side effect of upgrades to >>> version.pm? >>> If so it would require spelunking through svn to figure it out. Do >>> you happen to have a one-liner that exhibits the behavior? >> >> I think that Eric is actually intimately familiar with this issue. >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01416.html > > No, that's a completely different thing that never left alpha. > > Your original issue comes from installing 0.2808 on top of bleed > perl somehow -- however that manages to happen should now be fixed > by the fact that we have had a release. I suspect it has something > to do with 0.2808 not working with version.pm from bleed. > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/09/msg2307230.html > > --Eric > -- > So malloc calls a timeout and starts rummaging around the free chain, > sorting things out, and merging adjacent small free blocks into larger > blocks. This takes 3 1/2 days. > --Joel Spolsky > --------------------------------------------------- > http://scratchcomputing.com > ---------------------------------------------------